What to Go With? An ICO (Initial “Current” Offering) OR an IPO (Initial “Pre-Historic” Offering)

The Introduction:

INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING: IPOs have a very old and interesting beginning. An IPO is a concept of inviting public investment for a company when it launches public issues. This apparently makes the company, out of the boundaries of being just a “limited” company and opens the doors of ownership and profit share for people who are not “actively” involved in the operations of the company. These “shareholders” are mostly no decision makers and are just the equity holding individuals or companies. They are neither employed nor sponsored by the company. They could get benefited by securing the shares for longer and could wait for the exponential growth in the cost of shares, it could, however, go in an opposite direction too if the calculations don’t go according to the plan expected.

INITIAL COIN OFFERING: ICO, however, is more of an advanced version of an IPO, several glitches are resolved and removed, the boundaries of practical and materialistic bitcoin roulette objects and planning have been overcome and projects introduced have been focused upon, in an ICO. It is about “crowdfunding”, focusing towards “cryptocurrency”, which is used as a capital for startups. These startups are mostly owned and operated by the youngsters, who have new and innovative ideas for the business. Before or after the “tokens” become “coin” and come to the exchange, a lot of procedures have to be taken care of. People who buy tokens could sell the stakes, any time they wish to, even before the “exchange” phase comes. After the “token” comes to exchange and becomes a “coin”, it’s free from the introducer and completely comes to the “demand and supply” roller coaster”.

History: The Similarities and Differences.: there are several similarities, but significant differences too, when it comes to comparison of IPO and ICO. Historical evidence could be analyzed and studied for a better comprehension of the relativity, requirement, and longevity of the practicality of both, in today’s economic and technical world.

Initial Public Offering:

The first IPO was introduced during the reign of Roman Republic (509 BC – 27BC) when Publicani, those were the independent legal bodies, whose ownership was distributed into Partes (shares). These Partes were evidently sold to public investors and it was an open market, with fluctuating prices of Partes. There used to be spectators and it is not much different than the current scenario of share markets we can see these days. The existence and importance of Publicani were lost after the Roman Empire rose in 27 BC and so had the oldest stock exchange existed.

The first “modern IPO” occurred in 1602, when VOC (Dutch East India Company), opened a public issue for the company in order to raise funds. The Dutch East India Company was raising funds for the expansion of the worldwide business and the establishment of colonies in different parts of the world. The public was made a part of the endeavour and was offered profits with the growth of the company. VOC became the first company to introduce shares and bonds to the General public. So VOC officially could be credited as the first ever company to be listed on an official stock exchange.

During about the same time frame, in the United States, the first IPO was the public offering by Bank of North America. This private bank was adopted by The Confederation Congress, in may 1781, and was opened in Philadelphia, on 7th January 1782. The first IPO issued by Bank Of North America was issued in 1783.

Initial Coin Offering:

Mastercoin initiated the first token sale or “Initial coin offering” in July 2013. It started the trend of accepting legal tender (govt. approved currency) or exchangeable coins in order to buy a token.

ETHEREUM raised money in 2014, by a token sale, at a collection of 3700 Bitcoin in the first 12 hours, which was equivalent to $2.3 million at that time.

Karmacoin initiated a token sale in April 2014, for Karmashare project.

The trend, however, started in the year 2017, when ICOs and token sales became popular and there were significant numbers for the listings, advertisements and token sales till July 2017.

Now since it is a recently introduced thing and has not been followed by many (considerably), it doesn’t carry a very long history to be told about. Still, considering the popularity and growth this phenomenon has gained in last less than a decade, has made it an unavoidable chain of events.

It has lately attracted the consideration and interest of not only the youth with innovative ideas and startup plans but also established names and successful business around the world. One of the most relevant fundamental behind launching a token sale, or offering a coin is, how you back it up with the future plan about it, and how you represent it with the vision, which could be shared and felt by the general audience.

As much one could generalize the concept behind the coin and make it connected to the maximum number of “kinds” of people, more is the probability of its, touching the hard cap sooner. (Hard cap is the maximum number of tokens to be distributed during an ICO).

Marketing differences, traditional similarities:

Although both of these are different in terms of the business generation, the public participation and the probable “kinds” of people interested in either of them respectively, they have multiple traditional similarities.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.